China, India, Brazil and South Africa refused cut their carbon emissions; Philippines suffered disastrous effects

Protesters at the UN's 19th climate change conference in Warsaw. Greenpeace said the outcome meant increased civil disobedience against new coal plants and oil rigs would be needed to prevent catastrophic climate change. Photograph: Kacper Pempel/Reuters Kacper Pempel.

Compromise climate deal reached in Warsaw but critics brand it inadequate

Countries to indicate their 'contributions' to cutting emissions in early 2015

The UN's 19th climate change conference in Warsaw narrowly avoided collapse at the weekend after marathon talks produced a compromise deal that optimists believe is "just enough" to pave the way for an international agreement in Paris in two years' time.

Amid scenes of high drama at plenary sessions, two-hour "huddles" involving key players and deep divisions between rich and poor nations, bleary-eyed delegates from more than 190 countries who had been negotiating through the night finally agreed to move the process forward.

Although nobody was entirely satisfied with the outcome, it was agreed that all countries would indicate what "contributions" they would make to cut greenhouse gas emissions in advance of the Paris conference, so the adequacy of their efforts could be examined by others.

Both the EU and the US pressed for a firm timetable for countries to "place their cards on the table" in order to avoid a repetition in Paris of the chaotic Copenhagen summit in 2009, which was attended by more than 120 heads of state or government – many of them ill-prepared.

The Warsaw meeting also agreed to establish a "loss and damage mechanism" to help poorer countries cope with the consequences of global warming, as well as provide "increasing levels" of aid for adaptation and a set of rules to reduce deforestation and degradation of tropical rainforests.

Hahanapin kita kasama ang mga kaibigan mo sa "Kaibigan.Me" ( )

Climate aid

At the Copenhagen summit, developed countries pledged to provide climate aid of $100 billion per year after 2020 – 10 times the amount given annually from 2010 to 2012 – but in Warsaw they were not prepared to set an intermediate target showing how this could be achieved.

"We have seen essential progress. But let us again be clear that we are witnessing ever more frequent extreme weather events, and the poor and vulnerable are already paying the price," said UN climate chief Christiana Figueres. "Now governments . . . must go back to do their homework."

European commissioner for climate action Connie Hedegaard said the Warsaw conference, which ran for two weeks, showed "how challenging the way to an ambitious result in Paris will be". "But the last hours also showed that we are capable of moving forward."

One of the sticking points was a renewed insistence by China, India, Brazil and South Africa that only developed countries would have to make commitments to cut their emissions – a position described as "astonishing" by US climate envoy Todd Stern.

The EU also insisted that "all countries must contribute to the future reduction efforts", not just those subscribing to the UN's Kyoto Protocol, which now account for only 15 per cent of global emissions. The eventual compromise was to substitute "contributions" for "commitments" in the draft text.

Referring to the requirement for all countries to table their contributions well in advance of the Paris conference, if possible by early 2015, Danish environment minister Martin Lidegaard commented: "If we don't do our homework before we meet, then we won't get an agreement when we meet."

Jennifer Morgan, director of the Washington-based World Resources Institute's climate and energy programme, said: "Country representatives now need to return home to make significant progress on their work-plans and national offers that can become the backbone of a new climate agreement."

But Lord Nicholas Stern, author of the British government's seminal 2006 report on the economics of climate change, said the outcome in Warsaw was "simply inadequate" when compared to the scale and urgency of the risks associated with a failure to curb the growth in emissions – now at record levels.

Alden Meyer, veteran observer from the Union of Concerned Scientists, said: "There are some very difficult political issues that will need to be addressed over the next two years if we are going to have a successful outcome."


Jean-Pascal van Ypersele, vice-chair of the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, expressed the hope that Warsaw would not be portrayed as a complete failure "even if, as often, the slow speed of these negotiations is very frustrating, as seen from a climate scientist perspective".

But Martin Kaiser, head of the Greenpeace delegation, which was among those who walked out of the conference last Thursday, said the outcome "sends a clear signal that increased civil disobedience against new coal plants and oil rigs is needed to prevent catastrophic climate change".

Warsaw deal main points:


Countries agreed to announce plans for curbing greenhouse gas emissions "well in advance" of the crucial summit in Paris in December 2015 and "by the first quarter of 2015 for those in a position to do so".


Despite a 2009 promise of $100 billion per year in climate aid for poor countries from 2020, no mid-term target was set. The text merely urges developed countries to provide "increasing levels" of aid.

Loss and damage

The conference agreed a new "Warsaw International Mechanism" to provide expertise, and possibly aid, to help developing nations cope with losses from extreme events related to climate change.


Agreement was reached on REDD+, a framework to tackle deforestation in tropical countries, with the new Green Climate Fund playing a key role in channeling finance for projects to protect rainforests.

Philippines vulnerable to climate change, consul general says

Typhoon survivors seek refuge inside Redemptorist Church in Tacloban on Wednesday, Nov. 20, in Leyte province, central Philippines. (Bullit Marquez/Associated Press)

Speaks of 'extraordinary' typhoon, nation's struggle to become industrialized economy

The consul general for the Philippines in Toronto says her country's economy, devastated by Typhoon Yolanda (Haiyan), has long been held back by the many tropical storms that come ashore every year.

Sell your products online free at "Philippines Online Shopping Mall" (

Analysts describe the Philippine economy as newly industrialized, as it transitions from one based on agriculture to one based more on services and manufacturing.

But in a CBC interview with Mary Wiens for Metro Morning, Consul General Junever Mahilum-West said it's still a developing country and vulnerable to extreme weather because of geography and climate change.

"No one has accounted for the total destruction or loss of life we've experienced through typhoons," she said. "Without these natural disasters, we would be an industrial economy by now; we are an outward-looking economy, but what I'm saying is that we are in a very vulnerable part of the world, and one of the most vulnerable to climate change."

The typhoon that struck on Nov. 8 was "extraordinary" even for Filipinos, who are used to these storms, she said. "We had plans, but they were swept away."

Close to 20 tropical cyclones or strong storms pound the Philippines in a typical year, with up to half of these making landfalls.

The United Nations estimates Typhoon Yolanda (Haiyan) has affected about 11 million people in 41 provinces. It was one of the most powerful recorded typhoons to hit land, killing about 4,000 people and leaving four million homeless.

A Philippine official launched a hunger strike last week to pressure a UN climate change conference to come up with concrete steps to fight global warming.

Naderev Sano, a member of the Philippine Climate Change Commission, told the Washington Times he was fasting "in solidarity with my countrymen who are now struggling for food back home" — including his own brother, whom Sano said "has been gathering bodies of the dead with his own two hands."

Junever Mahilum-West, responding to criticism that the Philippine national government has been slow to react to the disaster, said it has been difficult to get aid to victims and that first responders were themselves victims.

"We have to treat this as a new normal and look at quickness of response and who will respond in case first responders are victimized."

She said you also have to consider that some people are living on spillways, the areas where water tends to go. Those are hazardous areas, but because Filipinos are exposed to so many disasters, they won't leave, she said.

With report from The Irish Times and CBC News Toronto

Share on Google Plus

About Makisig Bayani

I am among of the writers and administrators of this web site. I always on the heads up when it comes to Sports, Politics, Economy, Business, Physics, Mathematics, Technology, computers and NEWS all over the world that triggers ny eyes and interests. I am working as a volunteer with other 14 administrators, researchers, writers and contributors. We are a strong solid team. Join us and be among of the contributor with your name on each posted article.

    Anonymous or Google Comment
    Facebook Comment



Investment Recommendation: Bitcoin Investments

Live trading with Bitcoin through ETORO Trading platform would allow you to grow your $100 to $1,000 Dollars or more in just a day. Just learn how to trade and enjoy the windfall of profits. Take note, Bitcoin is more expensive than Gold now.

Where to buy Bitcoins?

For Philippine customers: You could buy Bitcoin Online at
For outside the Philippines customers  may buy Bitcoins online at